What Is Remote Viewing

Imagine the ability to perceive places, people, or events distant in space—and perhaps even time—using only the power of your mind. Not through guesswork or logical deduction, but through a structured application of innate intuitive or psychic abilities. This is the core premise behind "remote viewing" (RV), a term and a set of practices that emerged from controversial, government-funded research during the Cold War and continue to fascinate and polarize audiences today.

Unlike vague notions of psychic flashes or clairvoyance often depicted in fiction, remote viewing, at least as conceived by its pioneers, involves specific protocols and methodologies designed to elicit and record verifiable information about unseen targets. It’s a field steeped in espionage history, scientific debate, and claims of extraordinary human potential. But what exactly is remote viewing? How did it start? What do its practitioners claim, and what does science say? This post aims to provide an informational overview of this intriguing and often contentious subject, exploring its history, methods, applications, and the enduring controversies surrounding it.

I. From Cold War Chill to California Labs: The Genesis of Remote Viewing

The story of remote viewing doesn't begin in a vacuum. It builds upon decades of parapsychological research into phenomena like extrasensory perception (ESP) and clairvoyance, famously pioneered by researchers like J.B. Rhine at Duke University in the mid-20th century. However, the catalyst that propelled these fringe interests into the realm of classified government programs was the Cold War.

In the late 1960s and early 1970s, US intelligence agencies became increasingly concerned about reports suggesting the Soviet Union was investing heavily in "psychotronic" research. Fearing a potential "psi gap" where the Soviets might weaponize psychic abilities for espionage or influence, agencies like the CIA felt compelled to investigate the field themselves, even amidst internal skepticism.

This led them to the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) in Menlo Park, California (now SRI International). There, laser physicists Dr. Harold "Hal" Puthoff and Russell Targ secured initial CIA funding (under project codenames like SCANATE) around 1972 to explore the reality and potential applications of psychic phenomena. They weren't just looking for proof of ESP; they wanted to know if it could be reliably harnessed for practical purposes.

Their early work involved collaborating with individuals believed to possess exceptional psychic talents. Figures like the artist and writer Ingo Swann proved pivotal. Swann wasn't content with simply demonstrating potential abilities; he was instrumental in developing structured protocols aimed at making the process more controlled and repeatable. He disliked the vague term "clairvoyance" and pushed for a more neutral, process-oriented term – eventually leading to "remote viewing." Other notable early participants included Pat Price, a former police commissioner whose purported accuracy astonished researchers, and initially, the famous Israeli psychic Uri Geller, though his involvement proved controversial.

II. Project Stargate: The US Government's Psychic Spying Program

The intriguing, albeit often inconsistent, results from the SRI research convinced elements within the US intelligence and military communities (including the CIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM), and others) that remote viewing warranted further, more structured investigation and potential operational use.

From the early 1970s until 1995, the US government funded a series of classified programs dedicated to remote viewing research and application. These operated under various codenames over the years, including SCANATE, GRILL FLAME, CENTER LANE, SUN STREAK, and finally, the best-known umbrella term, Project Stargate.

The program's objectives were ambitious:

• Intelligence Gathering: Could remote viewers provide information about foreign military sites (like Soviet submarine bases or nuclear facilities), advanced technology, or political intentions?
• Locating Assets/Targets: Could RV help find downed aircraft, hidden hostages, or fugitives?
• Counter-Psychic Measures: Understanding potential psychic threats from adversaries.

Over two decades, hundreds of remote viewing missions were reportedly conducted, targeting a wide array of objectives. Military personnel and civilians were screened and trained using protocols developed primarily by Ingo Swann and refined at SRI and later at Fort Meade, Maryland, where the operational unit was eventually based. Viewers like Joseph McMoneagle (often cited as "Remote Viewer 001"), Lyn Buchanan, Mel Riley, Paul H. Smith, and David Morehouse became key figures within the operational program.

Proponents point to several anecdotal successes – famous examples include Pat Price's alleged description of a unique gantry crane at a Soviet site (Semipalatinsk), McMoneagle's purported description of a new Soviet submarine class inside its construction hall, and the locating of a downed Soviet bomber. However, the actual utility and reliability of the information obtained remained a persistent question throughout the program's existence.

III. The Mechanics of the Mind's Eye: Remote Viewing Protocols

What distinguishes remote viewing from simply "thinking about" a distant place is its reliance on structured protocols. The most influential of these is Controlled Remote Viewing (CRV), developed largely by Ingo Swann in collaboration with Puthoff, Targ, and others at SRI. CRV is a multi-stage process designed to help the viewer systematically access and decode psychic impressions while minimizing imaginative "noise" or analytical overlay.

A typical (simplified) CRV session might involve:

1. Targeting: The viewer is usually kept "blind" to the target, often given only arbitrary coordinates or a code number representing the target (selected randomly from a pool). A "monitor" or interviewer guides the viewer through the process without giving clues. Double-blind conditions (where the monitor also doesn't know the target) are sometimes used for stricter control in research settings.

• The Stages (Swann's CRV Model):Stage 1: Ideograms: The viewer writes the coordinate/number and immediately records a spontaneous graphic symbol (an ideogram) and associated feeling/gestalt related to the site (e.g., hard, soft, watery, energetic).
• Stage 2: Sensory Impressions: Exploring basic sensory data like textures, sounds, smells, tastes, colors, and basic dimensions (e.g., tall, flat, round).
• Stage 3: Dimensional Aspects: Sketching basic shapes and spatial relationships, perceiving more complex dimensions and movement.
• Stage 4: Aesthetic/Emotional/Tangible Qualities: Deepening the perception to include more abstract qualities – how the site feels (e.g., busy, deserted, industrial, natural), its apparent purpose, and more tangible aspects.
• Stage 5: Abstract/Intangible Exploration: Probing deeper into the "why" behind the site, its function, and more abstract concepts.
• Stage 6: Modeling/3D Representation: Creating sketches, clay models, or detailed drawings to represent the site's structure and layout.

1. Data Collection: Throughout the process, the viewer verbalizes their impressions, which are recorded, and produces written notes and sketches. The emphasis is on raw data, not immediate interpretation.
2. Analysis: After the session, the raw data (transcripts, drawings) is analyzed, often by someone other than the viewer, and compared against the actual target information (once revealed) to assess accuracy.

The theory behind this structure is that initial impressions (ideograms, basic senses) are less likely to be contaminated by the viewer's imagination or logical mind. By following the structure, the viewer supposedly learns to distinguish the faint psychic "signal" from internal mental "noise."

Other methodologies exist, such as Extended Remote Viewing (ERV), Scientific Remote Viewing (SRV), and Technical Remote Viewing (TRV), often representing variations or refinements developed by different practitioners after leaving the government program.

IV. Key Figures in the Remote Viewing Saga

Several individuals played crucial roles in the development and practice of remote viewing:

• Researchers:Dr. Harold Puthoff & Russell Targ: The SRI physicists who initiated the first funded research and brought RV to the attention of the intelligence community.
• Dr. Edwin May: A physicist who joined the SRI program later and eventually became the director of the research arm of Project Stargate through its conclusion. He has remained active in parapsychological research.
• Pioneering Viewers:Ingo Swann: Widely considered the "father" of remote viewing protocols (especially CRV). A highly influential figure known for his intellect and structured approach.
• Pat Price: An early SRI participant known for his reported high degree of natural accuracy on specific targets.
• Operational Military/Civilian Viewers (Stargate):Joseph McMoneagle: A decorated Army veteran, often called "Remote Viewer 001," known for his long service and numerous documented sessions within the program.
• Lyn Buchanan, Mel Riley, Paul H. Smith, Ed Dames, David Morehouse: Other notable individuals trained and employed as operational viewers within the Stargate unit at various times. Many went on to teach RV publicly after the program ended.

V. Purported Applications: From Spycraft to Self-Discovery

While its primary impetus was military and intelligence gathering, proponents have claimed or explored RV's use in various other domains:

• Intelligence: Targeting foreign military installations, tracking troop movements, locating hostages, assessing technological developments. (This was the main focus of Stargate).
• Archaeology: Some practitioners claim RV can help locate lost archaeological sites or provide insights into historical events. These claims are highly speculative and lack mainstream archaeological acceptance.
• Law Enforcement: Attempts have been made (often controversially) to use RV to locate missing persons or gain clues in criminal investigations. Results are anecdotal and lack rigorous validation.
• Business & Finance: Limited claims exist about using RV for market prediction or strategic decision-making, but this is not a common or validated application.
• Personal & Spiritual Growth: Many current RV training organizations emphasize its use for self-exploration, enhancing intuition, or exploring consciousness.

VI. The Unseen Elephant: Controversy, Skepticism, and the Scientific Stance

Despite the intriguing anecdotes and dedicated practitioners, remote viewing remains firmly outside the boundaries of accepted mainstream science. The overwhelming scientific consensus is skeptical, primarily due to:

• Lack of Replicability: Controlled scientific experiments attempting to replicate RV effects consistently under rigorous conditions (especially by independent skeptical researchers) have generally failed to produce positive results.
• Lack of Plausible Mechanism: There is no known physical or biological mechanism accepted by science that could explain how information about a remote location could be accessed solely by the mind, seemingly violating principles of causality and information transfer.
• Methodological Flaws in Proponent Studies: Critics often point to flaws in early SRI research and later pro-RV studies, including:
• Sensory Cueing: Potential for unintentional clues (verbal or non-verbal) passed from experimenters/monitors to viewers.
• Inadequate Blinding: Protocols not always sufficiently strict to prevent information leakage.
• Subjective Judging: Evaluating the accuracy of vague drawings and descriptions against a target can be highly subjective. Judges aware of the target might unconsciously favour matching elements (confirmation bias).
• File Drawer Effect: Positive or striking results might be preferentially published or reported, while failures are ignored, skewing the perceived success rate.
• The AIR Report (1995): Commissioned by the CIA to evaluate Project Stargate before its termination, the American Institutes for Research (AIR) concluded that while some laboratory experiments showed statistically significant effects suggesting more than chance was involved (a point emphasized by statistician Dr. Jessica Utts in her review), the phenomenon was unreliable, inconsistent, and had failed to produce actionable intelligence of practical value. Psychologist Dr. Ray Hyman, in his accompanying review, argued that the existence of a genuine paranormal phenomenon was not demonstrated and highlighted methodological weaknesses.

Skeptical organizations have conducted their own tests of alleged remote viewers under tightly controlled conditions, consistently finding results no better than chance guessing.

VII. Remote Viewing After Stargate: Life Beyond the Classified World

Following the publication of the critical AIR report in 1995, official US government funding for remote viewing research and operations ceased, and Project Stargate was terminated and declassified. However, this did not mark the end of remote viewing itself.

• Privatization: Many former Stargate personnel took their knowledge and protocols into the private sector, establishing training organizations to teach CRV and its variants to the public (e.g., organizations associated with McMoneagle, Buchanan, Morehouse, Smith, Dames, and others like the Farsight Institute).
• Continued Research: Some limited research continues through private funding or institutions interested in consciousness studies (like the Institute of Noetic Sciences (IONS) or grants from foundations like the Bial Foundation in Portugal, which has funded work by figures like Dr. Edwin May).
• Online Communities: The internet fostered communities of RV enthusiasts and practitioners who share techniques, conduct group viewings, and discuss results.
• Pop Culture: The story of the military's psychic spying program captured public imagination, inspiring books and films like Jon Ronson's "The Men Who Stare at Goats."

Remote viewing today exists largely as a fringe practice, a community of believers and practitioners operating outside mainstream science and government sponsorship, alongside a small number of researchers still investigating the potential realities of psychic phenomena.

VIII. Conclusion: An Enduring Enigma

Remote viewing presents a fascinating case study at the intersection of human potential, military history, scientific inquiry, and profound skepticism. Born from Cold War anxieties, it evolved into a structured methodology attempting to harness purported psychic abilities for practical, albeit clandestine, purposes. Its history involves dedicated researchers, compelling characters, classified operations, and enduring legends.

Yet, despite decades of research and practice, remote viewing has failed to gain acceptance from the mainstream scientific community due to persistent issues with replicability, methodological rigor, and the lack of a coherent theoretical framework. While practitioners often share compelling anecdotes and personal conviction based on their experiences, objective, scientifically validated proof remains elusive.

Is remote viewing a genuine, latent human ability waiting to be fully understood and utilized? Or is it a complex tapestry woven from intuition, psychological factors, subtle cues, subjective interpretation, and wishful thinking? The answer remains fiercely debated. What is certain is that the idea of reaching out with the mind to touch the unseen continues to captivate our imagination, ensuring that remote viewing, whatever its ultimate nature, will likely remain an enduring enigma exploring the perceived boundaries of human consciousness.

About the Author